Antibacterial Soap Is No Better At Killing Germs Than Regular Soap
September 18, 2015
New research suggests products marketed as "antibacterial soap" are no better at killing germs than regular soap. In fact, they could be worse for you.
Photo: Mariana Bazo / Reuters
A study published in the Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy found that hand cleaners laden with the antibiotic triclosan are no more effective than regular soap at killing germs.
Researcher Min-Suk Rhee and colleagues from Korea University found that in terms of bacteria killed, there was no difference between the two. Only after NINE HOURS did the triclosan-containing soap appear to have a significant effect in killing more germs.
The chemical triclosan is currently undergoing a safety review by the Food and Drug Administration for reputed ill health effects.
"Antibacterial activities of triclosan have been well documented. However, its risk remains controversial since various adverse effects have been reported, including allergen, antibiotic resistance, carcinogenic impurities and bioaccumulation," Rhee says. "Our study indicates there was no significant difference in antiseptic effects."
If using regular soap is just as effective, is antibacterial soap worth the risk?
Watch A Perplexed Beaver Become The Accidental Leader Of 150 Cows
Family Plays Horror Board Game And Gets More Than They Bargained For
The 10 Funniest Sibling Photo Recreations On The Internet
Rogue Stapler Leaves The 4th Floor To Explore The World
IKEA's Brilliant Response To Fashion Company's $2610 Version Of Their $1 Blue Bag
What Becoming A Billionaire Actually Feels Like
News Anchors Learn What A 'Furry' Is Live On Camera
This Kitten Was Abandoned, Then A Crow Does Something You've Never Seen
The Internet Can't Handle This Video Of A Baby Adoring His Mom
Comedian Has To Stop His Routine Because Of The Noise Coming From This Guy
After Unusual Bee Attack, Kentucky Farmer Gives The Most Country Interview Ever